Government Reports Wholesale Inflation Under Control
With respect to the food and energy sectors, price increases were far less than some might have anticipated: the energy component of the overall index rose by only 3.7 percent for the month, and this was offset by declining food costs, which dropped by six-tenths of a percent.
The good news on the inflation front was widely seen as an indication that the Federal Reserve has been successful in its measured tightening of the money supply, giving hope to some analysts that the central bank might even pause in its incremental increases in the discount rate in the months ahead to allow the economy some breathing room as it recovers from the economic effects of Hurricane Katrina.
Already, many believe that the Fed has added short-term liquidity to the economy. Stock prices that rose in the days after the calamitous hurricane indicated that few on Wall Street saw the damage as broadly affecting the economy, but this seemingly perverse reaction of stocks going up after a major natural disaster could have been the result of the Federal Reserve executing open market operations to push money into the banking system. A similar result was noted after the London bombings in early July, with the major stock indices jumping smartly even as the world was shocked by the attacks. It became evident shortly afterward that the Federal Reserve had been aggressively pumping money into the economy since the last day of June, which stimulated strong positive reactions in the financial sector that could not be overcome by adverse political and social events.Dark Wraith CyberGloss
The Federal Reserve uses "open market operations" to put money into or drain money from the banking system, thereby stimulating short-term economic activity or slowing it down.
The same phenomenon could explain the recent surge in stock prices: Hurricane Katrina made landfall early on the morning of August 29, 2005, leaving widespread devastation in its path through Louisiana, Mississipi, and Alabama; but stock prices moved notably higher in the following days, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average, for example, rising by 296.71 points, or 2.87 percent in the two weeks from the day the hurricane hit the U.S. mainland. The NASDAQ Composite index rose by 62.98 points, or 2.98 percent, and the Standard & Poor's 500 rose by 37.62 points, or 3.13 percent. These robust performance figures clearly show that Wall Street has taken a far more positive view of the tragedy in the Gulf Coast area than has the media in general, which has focused on the death, destruction, and hundreds of thousands of lives disrupted instead of keying on the potential business opportunities the newly cleared land will offer and the broader theme that the government and will place the nation further in debt to finance large-scale projects by select companies working hard to rebuild the area and to do so unencumbered by old regulations regarding workplace safety rules, environmental standards, and wage and hours laws.
In other news, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported on Wednesday morning that applications last week for home mortgages fell 1.4 percent after rising nearly seven percent in the week previous. Analysts attributed the slide to rising mortgage rates, which have only recently begun to show much sign of abating home buyers' and refinancers' appetites for new loans.
The average rate on a 30-year, fixed rate mortgage now stands at 5.72 percent, slightly higher than the 5.68 percent of one year ago, but still below the 6.08 percent that it reached in March of this year. The long-expected drop-off in home sales due to rising interest rates has yet to materialize, but concerns always mount when mortgage applications show a dip as happened last week. Although the Federal Reserve has maintained upward pressure on short-term interest rates, it has no direct say over longer-term rates, which have not moved upward in lock-step with the shorter term rates the central bank can control through its open market operations. This interest rate weakness at the long end of the so-called yield curve gives some economists reason to believe that recessionary pressures are continuing to build in the economy because historically, when long-term rates actually fall below short-term rates, an economic downturn almost always follows.Dark Wraith CyberGloss
A long-term interest rate has a related short-term interest rate embedded in it, but other factorscalled "risk," "maturity," and "liquidity" premiumsmake the long-term rate different from (and usually higher than) the related short-term rate.
In any event, if data provided by the United States government is to be believed, the American economy has shown significant resilience in the face of recent economic challenges, not the least of which is the misperception by many average citizens that inflation has been, and continues to be, a growing threat to purchasing power. The latest report on inflation at the wholesale level by the Bureau of Labor Statistics should put to rest any concerns that prices are spiraling out of control. On Thursday, the BLS will release its figures for inflation at the consumer level.
Should these numbers indicate that retail prices are as well under control as wholesale prices, there will be little justification for demands by workers and retirees for more than very modest cost-of-living adjustments in wages and retirement benefits from Social Security. Without the burden of having to pay more to people to compensate for the effect of inflation, both businesses and the federal government will be able to focus more resources on the important work that lies ahead in building a better America for the business community as it continues to thrive in an economy where even the largest natural disaster in more than a century cannot stop the stock markets from marching ever higher under the watchful help of an accommodating central bank and a fully engaged, one-Party system of rule.Dark Wraith CyberGloss
Most cost-of-living (COLA) adjustments calculated by the private and public sectors are based upon the inflation rate indicated by changes in the consumer price index.
<< 10 Comments Total
It seems to me that the hit from Katrina (occurring as late in the month as it did) is pretty much hidden from the August numbers. I would suspect that September will be different, particularly as the extent of impacts became more known. How's that for stating the obvious?
Have there ever been any studies completed that look at the relationship between consumer spending and episodes of increased donations, such as after a natural disaster?
Good morning, Dark Wraith.
I'm betting that the housing market will have an upswing, soon, due to the tropical storm, Katrina. So many people are displaced, but might be able to qualify for loans at their new locations. According to some articles, many will not be able to go back. They will start anew.
Good afternoon, Mr. Goat.
The economic effects of Hurricane Katrina will not show up until the September numbers are in, but I'll bet you my bottom dollar we won't see the government's inflation figures show any substantial uptick. The reason for this is that the gas prices rose and then eased back all in one month. The BLS's econometrics methods will adjust the skyrocketing leg downward ("quality" and "substitution effect" adjustments), but those methods won't be applied to the down leg on the price swings.
However, even without the effects of Hurricane Katrina in August, the government's claim strikes me as ludicrous that, excluding food and energy, there was no inflation at the wholesale level in August; and it's equally stunning that, including food and energy, wholesale prices rose by only six-tenths of a percent.
Perhaps I'm just jaded, but it seems to me that prices moved up aggressively in August. I would say, "Just look at housing," but I can't because inflation calculations no longer have the housing component from month to month: the government's argument is that people don't buy a house every month, but that logic flies in the face of the basic economic concept of "opportunity cost."
One way or the other, the government's numbers just don't smell right. That might not sound like a very "economics professional" kind of statement, but sometimes gut instinct is a little better than government data.
The Dark Wraith is feeling this one l-o-o-o-w in his gut.
Good afternoon, Trailer Trash.
You're right as rain about that: the housing market is going to have a boom, and that's going to create a ripple effect all through the Southeast and South.
That stupid hurricane is going to look like the best thing that could have happened to an economy that was flagging seriously; but the piper will be paid: federal and state budgets are going to go up, and that means pork and programs in every direction. The states will get what they can from the feds, and the feds are going to borrow money like gangbusters to finance all of this.
Oh, yes, and the Federal Reserve is going to crank open the money supply spiggots to provide "sufficient liquidity" to ensure that the skyrocketing sector prices will become a skyrocketing aggregate price level, which is a fancy way of saying that we'll get another punch of inflation down the road.
But that won't happen today, nor will it happen tomorrow. It will instead happen a couple of years down the road... just in time for a new President and a new Congress to be blamed for the wanton profligacy of the neo-cons and their enablers at the Federal Reserve.
That's how the Dark Wraith sees this coming down.
Good Afternoon Dark Wraith,
So, if one has modest assets, and few debts, how does one avoid getting gutted by the coming inflation? That's what I want to know.. Or am I just a thick head..
Good evening, SB Gypsy.
Actually, inflation is beneficial to borrowers because it erodes the face value of debt. In other words, if you own a home that has a mortgage loan for, say $150,000 on it, as inflation rages, that principal amount becomes worth less and less, so the lender ends up getting damaged.
Actually, this isn't the case at all, since the lender will be hedging his backside against inflation, as well. Also, even though the idea is accurate that inflation is beneficial to borrowers, the reality is not quite as clear: in the real world, borrowers are often times working poor and middle class people, and these are exactly the types of folks whose wages and salaries have not been keeping pace with inflation. That means, even if the face value of the debt is eroding under the inflation, the ability of the borrower to pay the bills is also being eroded under that same inflationary pressure.
As far as the average Joe and Jane hedging against inflation, don't bet on it: the instruments out there that could cover you aren't really available to you; the major price-level hedging instruments are on the big-dog turf. Even though commodities can be great rides during inflationary times, they're risky in any situation, and only a fool plays in the league where the big dogs hang out waiting for an easy meal on a small-time sucker's tab.
As far as commodities go, one that is traditionally tailor-made for the middle class is owner-occupied housing, since the value of a home often moves in tandem with inflationary pressures. The problem with playing that card is that the housing market is so over-priced right now as it is that, just as sure as you're going to jump in, the bottom's going to fall out. I honestly don't think that's going to happen for a while, but it eventually will.
That doesn't mean I wouldn't recommend buying a home right now. I certainly think owning a home is a nice thing provided you're buying it as a consumption commodity and NOT as an investment. Moreover, anyone borrowing money to buy a home needs to think very seriously about his or her long-term economic prospects. In other words, if you're going to take on a mortgage payment, are you certain that you're going to be able to pay that monthly mortgage payment if times get really rocky over the next few years? If you have doubts, you need to think twice about borrowing: bankruptcy isn't going to be a realistic option anymore if your disposable income goes Tap City.
As for me, I recommend a cave. Caves aren't too sensitive to inflation and deflation cycles, and the bank isn't going to be as swift in repossessing a cave as it would in repossessing a house in a nice neighborhood.
If a cave is too drafty for a person, then go with a trailer. A double wide is best.
And pay cash if you can. If you must borrow, borrow from a bank that doesn't have repo trucks with trailer hitches.
It's these small details that make the difference when we're talking about quality-of-life issues in the age of the neo-cons.
The Dark Wraith always offers the sound and practical advice.
Good Morning, Dark Wraith,
Moreover, anyone borrowing money to buy a home needs to think very seriously about his or her long-term economic prospects. In other words, if you're going to take on a mortgage payment, are you certain that you're going to be able to pay that monthly mortgage payment if times get really rocky over the next few years?
In our neck of the woods, even a rental in a lousy drug ridden neighborhood is nearly the same as paying a mortgage. (I'm thinking of my son, here) So, if you can get a mortgage, it makes more sense to buy a home than rent. If you end up giving it back to the bank, well, so be it.
I was asking more for someone who has paid off the house, and has a small nest egg put by, and is ready for retirement. If we retire, and inflation wipes out our nest egg, and a major corp decides to dump the pension that it's not funding anyway, and then Bushco guts SS, we'll end up back working at Walmart, or the Home Despot. Not what we had in mind...
I try to imagine going to NYC or DC and buying actual Euros, (and keeping them in what kind of account besides the coffee can??) And when the shit hits, then what could I do with actual Euros??
It's like a slow motion cataclysm, happening over years, and if I just had more imagination, I could avoid the worst of it.
Your cave idea looks the best, actually. I've been thinking for years that we need a subsistance farm - enough land to live off of, when worse comes to worse, and we reap the harvest that Bushco has been sowing lo these many years.
The real issue at hand is that we are all being fed a line of bullshit not only by our government but by our media as well.
Its over. It's all over. The Dream once known as America is dead.
These morons in power are looking to squeeze every last penny out of us and then I don't know what...I guess they think they will blast off into space or hide in their bunkers.
Or they will retire to their own private Islands.
All I can say is Bull Crap is Bull Crap and I for one have had enough.
I mean really, with the current administration where do you see the United States 3 years from now? Iran? North Korea? China? All the NeoConTastic dreams are even out of reach of this country.
Will we sit idlely by and watch as a nation we collapse upon ourselve into utter chaos?
Or will we rely on BlackWater USA to maintain order?
Ah, and therein lies a particularly vexing problem, PoliShifter. Once mercenaries are in a country, they can prove most troublesome to chase out. This is especially true in the present case where the mercenaries are actually citizens of the nation they are charged with occupying.
Similar situations arose in the later part of the Middle Ages, when so-called "companies" of mercenaries, having run out of steady work from the sovereigns, roamed the countryside terrorizing villages at will. Even in the kingdoms where there was some contingent of royal forces that might have been able to combat them, there was little will to do so because the knights, themselves, contemplated their own possible need at some point to become soldiers of fortune. In fact, some knights were actually mercenaries when they weren't in the service of the crown. The great poet Chaucer alluded to this phenomenon in a passing double-entendre comment in The Canterbury Tales.
Standing up to mercenaries militarily is frought with extreme danger. They can be far better ordered, far more motivated, and far more well-armed than regular soldiers; and they are not bound by the strictures of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (the "UCMJ"). Only civilian law binds them; and by virtue of their invitation to be in the country, it is likely that, at least to some extent, they have been provided exemption from the laws that order civil society.
That the republic as we have known it for a very long time is in grave danger is beyond dispute. For the neo-conservatives, dreaming as they do of some "better" place before this time as we have known it, the coming world may be idyllic.
For the remainder of us, the coming world will be a return to the Hell of previous, remarkably awful misery, complete with the violence of state-sanctioned thugs, the depletion of populations through unstoppable diseases, and the exploitation of the poor by uncircumscribed greed.
Unless there is a revolt of unimaginable proportions, that new world will arrive; and neither civil discourse nor armed violence by the indigenous peoples afflicted of its brutality will likely be enough to stop it.
So begins the 21st Century.
The Dark Wraith wishes the future had not come.
Ah Dark Wraith,
I should have known you would have caught that about BlackWater USA.
But I have to correct you on one point:
Dark Wraith Says:
"Once mercenaries are in a country, they can prove most troublesome to chase out."
They are already here my friend. And every Iraq War Veteran being dischared, all over the hill Air Borne and Special Forces, are being offered six figures to do what they were trained to do...Kill.
And they are loyal as long as the checks keep clearing.
I am afraid we are at that cross-roads my friend.
The difference I think now versus the Heshians or other mercenary groups of the past is:
Will fellow Americans be willing to kill fellow Americans in order to earn their paycheck?
katrina was just a prey-lude; a test to see if they can get away with it...